New Fujifilm X-T30 III and XC 13-33mm

Also today were announced the new Fujifilm X-T30 III and the XC 13-33mm F3.5-6.3 OIS.

The X-T30 III is just a refresh of the X-T30 II from 2021, the entry level X-series body. Added is the new processor on top of the X-Trans IV sensor, bringing it in par with the X-M5 and X-S20, with updated auto focus and video capabilities.

From the control changes, the left dial is no longer used for drive. but instead is, like on the X-T50 and the X-M5, the film simulation dial, with support for film recipes as introduced by the X-E5. Still hoping for a firmware update doing this on the X-M5.

It also adds direct printing support to the Instax Link printers as well as the associated “crops” for the Mini, Square and Wide formats. Fujifilm, can we get a firmware update to do that on the X-M5 and X-E5 ?

This camera comes optionally with the new XC 13-33mm F3.5-6.3 OIS that replaces the XC 14-45. A bit wider, and shorter, slower at the long end, and it dropped the power zoom.

Shipping in November 2025 body only for CA$1249, or in December as a kit for CA$1449, in three different colours, Silver, Black and Graphite.

DPReview: Fujifilm X-T30 III adds fresh ingredients to familiar recipe.

Fujifilm product page.

Rangefinder less Leica M EV-1

Take a Leica M11, remove the rangefinder and replace it with an EVF, shave the price by 10% (it’s still unaffordable) and you have the Leica M EV-1.

DPReview preview:

At the most basic level, you can get essentially the same sensor in the Sony a7CR for considerable less money, and get a similar shooting experience by adapting your M-mount lenses to fit. It won’t be as small, be as nicely built or say Leica on the front, but in purely pragmatic terms, it’ll be comparable.

I think that removing the rangefinder is like removing the main reason to buy a Leica M camera. I don’t see where that make sense. If you want to use M lenses but don’t care for the rangefinder, the above suggestion from DPReview will be probably more adequate, and anything else, the law of diminishing returns applies. And instead of a Sony, you can also use any other full frame mirrorless like a Nikon Z or Panasonic S.

This doesn’t mean Leica is abandoning the rangefinder though, but I still wonder who this camera is for except if you want to 12K.

One day I shot two rolls of film in a Leica M7. And I loved it.

A black & white picture of the WW2 era aircraft up close. To the right the propeller. To the left further away the shiny nose of the Beechcraft Expedition with the propeller reflecting in it.
Beechcraft Expedition, Langley Museum of Flight, Langley, BC — October 2011
Leica M7
25mm Biogon f2.8
Kodak BW400CN

The Leica M EV-1 will cost CA$12,315 as per one of my local stores, and should be available starting 23 October 2025 (ie today).

Post scriptum:

David Imel video Why Leica shed its most iconic feature (YouTube) explains the rangefinder quite well, but I’m not convinced the reasoning make sense.

Analogue aF-1

Analogue announced the pre-order for the Analogue aF-1.

The aF-1 is a compact 35mm point-and-shoot camera designed by the Amsterdam company Analogue. It has 35mm f2.8 glass lens, LiDAR autofocus and built-in flash. All the features expected from the early 21st century point-and-shoot.

The pre-order price is 449€ or CA$790 (+ shipping) for a delivery Q1 2026.

Specs are not unlike an Olympus mju-II.

More film: Lomography LomoChrome Classicolor 200

A day after Kodacolor 100 and 200 are announced, Lomography comes out with a new 200 ISO colour negative. LomoChrome Classicolor 200 is a “limited edition”. Not sure why limited edition, I suspect they might have obtained a limited stock of something no longer produced. CN100 is thought to be a Kodak stock that is not available under a different brand.

It will be sold for CA$13.90 which is higher than of the Kodacolor 200 listed at CA$16.00.

via Kosmofoto

And the Kodacolor announcement was such a big deal that non photography outlets talked about it.

Kodacolor is back

The year is 2025 and Kodak announces Kodacolor. Like this was 1942.

Old is new again.

This news has been all around the internet, Kosmofoto has some details: Kodak launches new films called Kodacolor 100 and 200.

The short version is Kodak, not Kodak Alaris, will be selling a C-41 colour negative film, 100 and 200 ISO, in 135 rolls of 36 exposure, called Kodacolor. We see them listed at US$9.75. At the moment it is unclear which stock these two films are made of.

Kodacolor was the name for the 1942 colour negative film Kodak release to the market. It was the first colours negative for colour printing and had a speed of 25 ASA and later 32 ASA. It was discontinued in 1963 to be replaced by Kodacolor X, at 64 and later 80 ASA, and then in 1974 by Kodacolor II which used C-41 process to replace the C-22 process previously used. That latter version was 80 and then later 100 ASA. The last version of Kodacolor was Kodacolor Gold…

Update: I see the Kodacolor 100 and 200 listed for CA$15.75 and CA$16.00 respectively.

Esquisse, Sketch of a camera

DPReview has an interview with the people at Esquisse. Esquisse is the French word for sketch, and a French startup company whose goal is to design a new pocketable camera with interchangeable lenses, trying to fill a void left by Panasonic and Olympus. Why these two? Because Esquisse are designing a micro 4/3 camera which make sense given the range of high-quality and reasonably priced lenses.

Currently in the early stages, the design seems to focus on having control accessible at your fingertips. The four person team is trying to strike the right balance with the features. And their goal is to build it in “public” i.e. to have update and get feedback from outside. At the moment the design feature an EVF, a built-in 256GB memory (a trend I do not like), words of a built-in battery (WAT?), a touchscreen and a few knobs. Nothing ground breaking but you don’t need to, to make a better tool — albeit a few bad trends. No words on what they envision for the software, since it is a digital camera this is not even a question, but I just hope they go the Leica M9 route rather than the Pixii-you-need-a-phone-app route.

Physical size is always a concern to me. The Fujifilm X-M5 feels a bit small in my hands and I did try the Panasonic GM-1 that felt too small, but the esquisse having an EVF looks promising.

Esquisse also state they don’t want to crowdfund it until they have something physical, if they even fund this way.

We’ll see, it could just end like it started.

Another French designed camera is Pixii which now exist as a full-frame M compatible camera. So why not a second French camera.

New films

To celebrate the 100th anniversary of the camera, Leica announced their own branded film, the Monopan 50. It’s a 50 ISO black & white 35mm film, made in Germany. It has a lot in common with the Adox 50. It is likely to cost US$10 (£10/€12) a roll while the Adox HR-50 is priced at US$7.50 to be available in August 2025. I haven’t found a Canadian price yet.

In February Recently Harman Technologies released the Harman Red. Now Kosmofoto tells us it is being made in 120. Like with Phoenix, it’s always good to see them follow-up on medium format.

Fujifilm X-E5 and 23mm f/2.8 pancake

Some thoughts about the just announced Fujifilm X-E5, and its companion the 23mm f/2.8 pancake lens. Another camera I don’t have that I will talk about.

Take the X-T5, with 40 megapixel, IBIS and everything, put it in the X-E4 form factor, with the EVF on the side like on a rangefinder camera. Add a dedicated film simulation dial, not unlike the X-M5. With X-Trans 5 sensor and X-Processor 5 (the latest) it the top of the Fujifilm image pipeline.

The aluminium machined top, like on the GFX100RF calls for a more high end camera. Sadly it’s not weather resistant.

Fujifilm “retro inspired” design has always been at the foundation of the X-series camera. And the X-E5 pushes it a bit further in the EVF with an optional “classic” display, a minimal display simulating a 7-segment LCD and a needle exposure meter. Is this distraction free or just nostalgia? Underneath the camera on the bottom there is a small button for Bluetooth that looks like the film rewind release on manual cameras. As for connectivity it can connect to the current set of Instax Link printers.

Like on the X-E4, the LCD flips up to the top, great for selfies. There is a mic jack but not headphone out unless you use the USB adapter, so this might not be the best video camera. I personally wouldn’t pick this. That doesn’t mean its not capable, just that it might be limited.

Aspect ratio and digital zoom

The X-E5 supports the following aspect ratio (crops): 3:2, 16:9, 1:1, 4:3, 5:4. Nothing special. Why not the 17:6 or the 64:25 found on the GFX100 RF? This is a disappointment. The front lever allow selecting a digital zoom, x1.5 and x2. These are also crops.

Film simulation dial

The film simulation dial is under the top plate with a little window on top to show the current setting. I believe I still have the same opinion as on the X-M5 about the Film Simulation dial. But, in FS1 to FS3, you can set Film Simulation recipes. Apparently the settings of the FS modes can be combined Custom modes, ie each custom mode has its own settings. FINALLY. Maybe can we get this as an update on the X-M5, please, please, Fujifilm?

23mm pancake

At the same time the X-E5 is announced, the 23mm f/2.8 pancake WR is announced. It’s like the 27mm pancake, but 23mm. With an equivalent 35mm field of view (in 35mm), this is the third 23mm lens in the Fujifilm XF lineup along with the f/2 and f/1.4. This one offer a very compact alternative, and I expect it will be successful among Fujifilm street shooters.

Bundle

The X-E5 comes in either a body only or in a kit with the new 23mm f/2.8 WR pancake, in August 2025. The lens alone won’t be available before December 2025. I expect scalpers to buy the kit, hard to get, and then sell the two separately at over inflated price.

In that combination, the X-E5 is like a X100VI, but for CA$90 more. The X100VI has a faster f/2 lens, built in ND filter, different flash sync, and is a little bit smaller.

Price

CA$2000 or with the lens CA$2250, while the lens alone will get to CA$560. It’s more expensive down South with the tariffs. Some say it is expensive, but it is comparable to the X-T50.

Comes on two colours: silver and black. And the lens in an assorted colour.

Fujifilm X half

This is it. The long rumored “Half frame” Fujifilm compact camera has been announced. Its name is X half, first of its name. A lot of the new videos on my YouTube feed are about it today, and this is my cold take as I don’t have the camera.

It’s not the new revision of an existing one camera. It’s a new concept, like when Fujifilm released the X100 back in 2011. I don’t know if the Pentax 17 triggered this or if there is some sort of trend among camera designers in Japan, but Fujifilm decided with the X Half to embrace the “half frame” vertical. Note that in that context the use of half frame refer to the camera using 35mm film that use half the frame (vertically) in order to provide more images per roll. Notable vintage half-frame cameras include Olympus Pen (the name was reused for their Micro 4/3 compact line), Ricoh Auto Half, Canon Demi EE17 and Canon Dial, they were build for a purpose: smaller size. They came out of favour as more compact point and shoot were available.

Overview

It has an optical viewfinder, more like what was on the X10, with a 90% coverage.

It has a vertical screen and a 1″ (8.8 x 11.7mm) sensor, vertical with a cropped aspect ratio of 3:4 producing 18 Mpix images. This is not half a full frame. It’s much smaller.

The lens is a 10.8mm (32mm equivalent) f2.8. It is auto-focus, has a manual focus ring and an aperture ring with a knob. You can shoot aperture priority, or toggle it to A.

It doesn’t produce raw files. Like other Fujifilm cameras it has film simulations, 10 of them, and 19 filters (the X-M5 has 13), some of them seen on the Instax Evo. For nostalgia there is date stamp option, that will imprint into the picture the date, using a 7-segement style led display, like in the 80-90s — probably one of the things I dislike the most — but if you want to emulate film cameras, then it’s a must have. Film simulations and filters are mutually exclusive, like on other X-Series.

Controls

The X half has a physical lever by the thumb rest, a lever that looks like the winder on film cameras. Some Instax cameras have this kind of lever to trigger printing the picture. Outside of film mode (more on this later), it is used to trigger the diptych feature: take a picture, pull the lever, and the next image will be part of a diptych, a combo of two pictures. It is what Fujifilm calls 2-in-1, and apparently it also works with movies.

Otherwise there is not so many other physical controls: an exposure compensation dial under the shutter button, a still/video toggle, playback button, and a flash on/off switch on the side. Everything else is done through the vertically oriented 450×680 dots touch screen at the back that also offer live view, combined with the smaller touch screen strip to its left. The film simulation is selected via that touch screen strip whose position reminds us of the window that show the type of film loaded on point and shoot film cameras. Nice touch, probably inspired by the X-Pro3 film simulation screen that was shaped like the holder of the top of a cardboard film box. When shooting in S or M mode, the shutter speed is changed from the same touch screen, and few other feature are controller through swipes.

The film mode

The film mode is the main part of the “fun” this camera promotes.

When you toggle the film mode, the camera switches to a mode where you select a number of frames (36, 54 or 72) and a film simulation, and you stick to it until you finish the roll, either by shooting all frames or by cancelling it. After each frame you must wind with the lever to advance. Also you are required to use the OVF and you can’t use the rear LCD to view the picture. Instead it becomes the control panel, including a simulated LCD display as found on a 90s film cameras. About the roll size, since it’s a half frame, I don’t understand why 36 has 18 exposure rolls have never been a thing. 48 would have made sense for a 24 exposure role. 54 is twice 27 which is how much I could get out of a Fujifilm 24 exposure roll, or how much you get out of their disposable film cameras. Well, if going for accuracy, this isn’t it.

The rest of the film mode is addressed by the X half mobile app, to produce “contact sheet”. Each roll is in its own folder on the card.

If this camera is a love letter to film shooting, why didn’t you make a film camera, Fujifilm? (I know, it’s complicated) I wonder if Fujifilm sent one to some the film shooter crowd on YouTube.

Other features

The limited video mode, toggled with a physical button, can record up to 2160×1440 vertical short videos (less than 60 sec). This is not a camera for shooting video.

A LED makes for the built-in flash. While this is bright enough, it doesn’t give the flash look as it doesn’t freeze the subject like a strobe. Unfortunately the cold shoe on top doesn’t allow the use of an external flash.

Other features include direct Instax Link printer support, unlike more expensive camera.

The X half is available in three colours: black, charcoal and silver. I would pick charcoal I think.

Missing

It’s hard to know what is missing without having the camera, but raw file output is clearly one. True flash strobe, which is important for going with that retro image look is another one.

Also I haven’t seen in the various review how to configure film simulation recipes, and that one is probably a bummer. A big missed opportunity in my opinion. I think, Fujifilm should really capitalize on the recipes as user feature, but the question is whether the hardware behind it is similar to the other X series or if it is much less powerful to offer all the parameters.

Conclusion

At an MSRP of CA$999, (it’s US$849 with tariffs down south) it is not especially cheap. The X-M5 (body-only) is barely more money. While this is cheaper than the X100VI (less then half the prices), it is not a cheaper version of the X100VI, not at all and is so far the only other compact camera in the Fujifilm lineup — three if you count the GFX100RF — in a market segment largely abandoned by most vendors.

I think the only way I will try this camera is if I get it on loan. Fujifilm, if you hear me, hit me up.

DPReview says Fujifilm’s new camera is silly and fun, but is it just a joke?, a headline which made me think “if only they made the announcement on 1st of April”, while Chris and Jordan from Petapixel said “it’s a lot of fun”.

Will the X half become the new camera of the TikTok generation?